Vero Man: The 1915-1916 Discovery in Vero Beach, Florida

In October 1915 a collector working the Indian River Farms Company canal at Vero found human bones among extinct Ice Age animals, and science argued about them for a century.


Short answer: Vero Man is the popular name for the human remains found at Vero Beach in October 1915, when Frank Ayers uncovered portions of a human skeleton in the bank of the Indian River Farms Company drainage canal, in a layer with extinct Ice Age animals. State geologist Elias H. Sellards reported the find in 1916, but most archaeologists of the time did not accept a Pleistocene age. Official and scholarly sources still disagree: the Florida Museum wrote in 2015 that Sellards was right, while a 2024 University of Utah Press volume concludes the human remains were intrusive.

Last verified: October 16, 2026, against the sources listed at the end of this page.

What was Vero Man?

Vero Man is the name attached to human bones that came out of a drainage canal bank at Vero in October 1915, lying in the same bed as the bones of extinct Ice Age animals.

According to the Florida Museum of Natural History, Frank Ayers found portions of a human skeleton in Stratum 2 in October 1915, and at that time these were the first well documented human remains from the Pleistocene of North America. The canal had been dug by the Indian River Farms Company, and the museum locates the fossil site in Vero Beach, Indian River County, southeast of the Vero Beach municipal airport.

The Vero remains were more than one skeleton. The museum's May 3, 2012 study announcement says two nearly complete human skeletons were discovered at the Vero Beach site, and that its researchers analyzed samples from 24 human bones and 48 animal fossils in the museum's collections. The same release says the Vero site is, in Barbara Purdy's words, still the only site where there was an abundance of actual human bones, not just artifacts, associated with the animals.

Vero Man timeline from the Florida Museum and the University of Utah Press
YearEvent at the Vero canal siteSource
1913F. C. Gifford finds the first fossils in the canal bankFlorida Museum
1915Frank Ayers finds portions of a human skeleton in Stratum 2 in OctoberFlorida Museum
1916Sellards reports the find and holds an on-site conferenceFlorida Museum
1918First excavation phase by Ayers, Weills and Sellards endsFlorida Museum
1919Sellards leaves Florida for TexasFlorida Museum
1927Weills' widow donates his fossil collection to the Florida Geological SurveyFlorida Museum
1956 and 1957Robert Weigel screens Stratum 2 and 3 on the north side of the canalFlorida Museum
2012Rare earth study of 24 human and 48 animal samplesFlorida Museum
2014 to 2017New excavations at the Old Vero SiteUniversity of Utah Press
2024Excavation volume concludes the human remains were intrusiveUniversity of Utah Press

How were the Vero canal fossils found?

The fossils surfaced when an Indian River Farms Company drainage canal at Vero cut through a bone-bearing deposit.

The Florida Museum says the Vero canal cut through a deposit that extended for over 300 meters, though it is only a few meters thick. The museum credits F. C. Gifford with the first canal bank fossils, in 1913; he passed them to Isaac M. Weills, who began to collect more with Frank Ayers and other local residents. Fossils were found on the banks of both sides of the Vero canal and both east and west of the railroad track crossing it. Weills reported the discovery to Florida state geologist Elias H. Sellards, who visited with his assistant Herman Gunter. Collecting efforts increased significantly after Ayers found the human bones in 1915.

The Florida Museum gives the Vero locality's coordinates as 27.65 degrees north and 80.40 degrees west. Anyone hoping to collect or dig there needs the City of Vero Beach's authorization first, the museum says.

What did Sellards claim in 1916?

Sellards argued that the people whose bones lay in the Vero canal bank had lived alongside the extinct animals buried with them.

The Florida Museum lists his 1916 report in the Florida Geological Survey Annual Report, titled Human remains and associated fossils from the Pleistocene of Florida, and two 1917 papers titled On the association of human remains and extinct vertebrates at Vero, Florida, one in the American Journal of Science and one in The Journal of Geology. The U.S. Geological Survey publications record also lists a 1916 Sellards article in Science, Human remains from the Pleistocene of Florida. He held an on-site conference at Vero with leading archaeologists of the day.

The claim reached far beyond Indian River County. The University of Utah Press says the Vero argument was the first serious challenge to the idea that people had not reached Florida before the Holocene, an idea widely held until the Folsom discoveries of 1926. Sellards had chemistry on his side as well: an early geochemical analysis cited by the Florida Museum showed the Vero human bones mineralized to the same degree as those of Pleistocene megafauna.

Why was Vero Man so controversial?

Most archaeologists of the period did not believe the Vero human bones were of Pleistocene age, the Florida Museum states.

The heart of the quarrel was whether the people and the animals at Vero were the same age. The 2012 Florida Museum release says that after the Vero Beach fossils were found between 1913 and 1916, some prominent scientists convinced researchers the human skeletons were from more recent burials and not as old as the animals, a question that remained unanswered because no dating methods existed.

Field work at Vero ended within a few years. The Florida Museum says the first excavation phase by Ayers, Weills and Sellards lasted until 1918. Sellards left Florida for Texas in 1919, and the Florida Geological Survey turned its attention elsewhere, which the museum suggests was probably due in part to the unfavorable reception his Vero work had received.

Where are the Vero Man bones today?

The Vero human bones sampled in 2012 are in the Florida Museum's collections in Gainesville, and some early Vero fossils went to the Smithsonian.

The 2012 release says researchers analyzed samples from 24 human bones and 48 animal fossils in the Florida Museum's collections. Instead of radiocarbon dating, which requires collagen, they compared rare earth elements, because a lack of collagen in the Vero Beach specimens made radiocarbon dating impossible, Purdy said.

Animal specimens from the Vero canal took several routes. The Florida Museum says some Vero specimens in the Florida Geological Survey collection were turned over to the Smithsonian for safekeeping when Sellards departed, although the survey kept the holotype skull of Tapirus veroensis and the holotype skull of Canis ayersi, now Canis dirus. Weills' widow donated his entire fossil collection to the survey in 1927, and about 350 identifiable specimens were collected in this first phase. UF graduate student Robert Weigel excavated on the north side of the canal in 1956 and 1957, recovering about 1,100 identifiable specimens and some worked flint but no human fossils in Stratum 2.

Was Sellards right about Vero Man?

Official and scholarly sources disagree on whether Sellards was right about Vero Man.

The Florida Museum wrote in 2015 that new geochemical analyses published in 2012 and detailed excavations by a modern archaeological field crew in 2014 had shown Sellards correct about humans coexisting with extinct megafauna at the Vero site. The 2012 rare earth study found the human and animal samples were all from the late Pleistocene, about 13,000 years ago, though University of Cincinnati researcher Kenneth Tankersley noted it did not provide an absolute date. The museum says the 2014 Mercyhurst Archaeological Institute crew led by C. Andrew Hemmings found undisturbed strata near Sellards' original area, with ancient soil layers dated to about 8, 12 and 19 thousand years before present. In June 2011 the Smithsonian said research on an engraved bone found near the Old Vero Site further validated his claims that people hunted animals at Vero Beach during the last Ice Age, claims disputed over the past 95 years.

The most recent published word on the human bones points the other way. A 2024 University of Utah Press volume on the 2014 to 2017 re-excavation, written by Adovasio, Hemmings and Vento, reaches the opposite verdict: according to the publisher, its new data show Sellards' claims are not supported and the Vero human remains were intrusive from a later time horizon, the position his early critics had taken. The two positions are stated here as their sources give them. The modern excavations and the separate Vero mammoth engraving have their own Digital Towns pages.

Last verified: October 15, 2026, with fresh reads of the Florida Museum's Vero Canal Site entry and its May 2012 study release, the University of Utah Press listing, the 2011 Smithsonian Insider release and the USGS record of Sellards' 1916 Science article.

Frequently asked questions

Where exactly was Vero Man found?

In the bank of a drainage canal dug by the Indian River Farms Company. The Florida Museum of Natural History puts the site inside Vero Beach, southeast of the city municipal airport, and says collecting or digging there needs city authorization.

Who found the Vero Man bones?

The Florida Museum of Natural History credits Frank Ayers, one of the local collectors working the canal with Isaac M. Weills, with finding parts of a human skeleton in October 1915. State geologist Elias H. Sellards studied the find and published it in 1916.

Was Vero Man a single skeleton?

No. The Florida Museum's 2012 release says two nearly complete human skeletons were discovered at the Vero Beach site, and its researchers sampled 24 human bones held in the museum's collections.

Why can't the Vero Man bones be carbon-dated?

Radiocarbon dating requires collagen, and Barbara Purdy said in the 2012 Florida Museum release that a lack of collagen in the Vero Beach specimens made it impossible. The team compared rare earth elements instead, which shows relative, not absolute, age.

Has the Vero Man debate been settled?

Not in the sources. The Florida Museum wrote in 2015 that Sellards' claims were correct, while the University of Utah Press describes its 2024 volume on the 2014 to 2017 Old Vero excavations as concluding that the human remains were intrusive from a later time horizon.

Sources

  1. Vero Canal Site, Stratum 2, Florida Vertebrate Fossils (Florida Museum of Natural History) https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/florida-vertebrate-fossils/sites/vero-canal-site-stratum-2/ Used for: location, 1913 to 1918 discovery sequence, Ayers October 1915, Sellards publications and conference, reception, collections, later digs, 2015 assessment
  2. Early North Americans lived with extinct giant beasts (Florida Museum of Natural History, May 3, 2012) https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/science/early-north-americans-lived-with-extinct-giant-beasts Used for: two skeletons, 24 human and 48 animal samples, no collagen for radiocarbon, rare earth result, Purdy and Tankersley quotes
  3. The Old Vero Site (8IR009): One Hundred Years Later, The 2014-2017 Excavations (University of Utah Press, 2024) https://uofupress.com/books/the-old-vero-site-8ir009/ Used for: first serious challenge before Folsom 1926; 2024 conclusion that remains were intrusive
  4. Bone fragment is only Ice Age artwork from America to show a proboscidean (Smithsonian Insider, June 22, 2011) https://insider.si.edu/2011/06/bone-fragment-may-contain-only-known-ice-age-artwork-from-america-to-depict-a-proboscidean Used for: Sellards claims disputed for 95 years
  5. Human remains from the Pleistocene of Florida (U.S. Geological Survey Publications Warehouse record, Sellards 1916, Science) https://www.usgs.gov/publications/human-remains-pleistocene-florida Used for: 1916 Science article
Last updated: October 16, 2026

How this page was made

Digital Towns uses AI assistance to research and write its guides, and every page is only as good as the sources it cites. Our goal is the most accurate, useful local information possible.

This page was fact-checked twice before publishing.

If you see an error, or anything you can show is false, tell us right away and we will take a third look.

Report an error
Quote or describe the part that's wrong.
Explain what's actually true.
Only if you'd like a reply. Never shown publicly.

How we fact-check

Continue exploring

Photo credits